Arpas y arpistas de la península

Memo on imported Pakistani harps (ENGLISH VERSION)

arpa(Translated by Isabel Abal) (Spanish Version HERE)

These past few weeks we’ve received some enquiries and comments about the growing invasion in the market during the last couple of years –in other European countries, websites as eBay and other online selling services this intrusion has been going on longer and on a bigger scale– of low cost harps and many other stringed instruments coming, mainly, from Pakistani workshops and some other Asian countries. These instruments have highly competitive prices, if we compare them to the prices offered by national luthiers and even those of the usual commercial brands in the harp world. Some of the harp models can be bought for no more than 300 euros.

Most of the enquiries made were about the reliability and quality of the instruments, since these prices are a call for mistrust to any cautious buyer. Additionally, we’ve been privy to the desolation of some luthiers when they’ve come upon clones of some of their harp models on these Asian websites without previous authorization on their part.

These “imported” harps are visually available on the builders’ websites and eBay. They show an attractive aspect, with abundance of ornaments carved on their sides, and with enticing promises about their virtues. In some cases, even with some sound samples available. Making a quick search on the Internet (on English speaking forums, mainly) is enough to find comments and opinions regarding this subject, in most cases of a negative nature. Here, in Arperia, we had the opportunity of testing two of these instruments, and these are our impressions:

We have to point out that both instruments were found on stores. One of them was found on a music store whose owner had acquired the instrument having in mind the needs of first year conservatory students (he told us that he had already sold two of these harps for a price a bit over € 400); the other one was found on a second-hand shop (for about € 500). After testing them for a good while, our impressions can’t be anything but disastrous.

  • Both instruments presented extremely serious tuning problems. To the point of, on the first case, having to give up after half an hour of battling with the instrument. We were unable to reach a stabilized tune, not even on one octave. Neither tuning by octaves, nor alternate fifths, not even string by string tuning worked. We even tried lighting a candle in honor of Saint Cecilia, but there was no way of getting anything similarly resembling to a scale. On the second case, we managed to get the instrument roughly tuned, even though it was necessary to frequently recalibrate it, and the tension of the strings was completely unbalanced.
  • Strings were placed with uneven distances between them.

  • Lots of muted or buzzing strings on both instruments. On the second one, which apparently sounded a bit better than the other, the bass sounds were buzzy, and the sound broke as soon as the notes were put together correctly.
  • The sound was lacking in general, sometimes verging on the unpleasant. Hardly any sustain, and a biting and buzzy sound not even close to leveled between the strings.

  • The semitonal levers were loose and of a disgraceful-quality. On the second model, they were more like metal hooks screwed directly into the console. Regarding the first model, they were metallic levers of a very poor quality (the material seemed to bend upon finger pressure), which were completely loose. Engaging the lever could alter a note a quarter of a tone, a semitone, or any other given interval. In addition, many of them made noises when you activated them, or even displaced the string sideways.

 Reaching this point, this blog can’t do anything but strongly recommend against the acquisition of one of these instruments.

 On a closing note, we invite you to do a reflection. Behind the construction of a musical instrument, there’s a long, expensive and difficult process from which the musicians who are buying those instruments only get to see a minor part.

All the previous work of investigation regarding the instrument; all the tests, proportion calculations, quality materials selection, blueprints creation…all that is a time and economic investment that goes well beyond the construction of the instrument, and it is something unique to each luthier. Something for what is worth to pay a price. The world of musical instruments construction is a highly competitive one, where building high quality instruments at an affordable price is the only way to survive. Buying a cloned instrument could result in the acquisition of a visually exact instrument, but with little to none probabilities of obtaining the same musical achievements as the original, achievements that come from a combined process of study, meditation and maturation of said instrument. It really comes down to the small details that you can’t see on a picture but which, in reality, are the ones that give a soul to that instrument.

 Resorting to this is, without a doubt, like spiting in the wind if we want to have high quality luthiers building top quality instruments. Sooner or later, the spit is going to hit us in the face.

Anuncio publicitario

Un comentario el “Memo on imported Pakistani harps (ENGLISH VERSION)

  1. Pingback: Nota sobre arpas paquistaníes de importación. | www.arperia.com

Deja una respuesta

Introduce tus datos o haz clic en un icono para iniciar sesión:

Logo de WordPress.com

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de WordPress.com. Salir /  Cambiar )

Imagen de Twitter

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Twitter. Salir /  Cambiar )

Foto de Facebook

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Facebook. Salir /  Cambiar )

Conectando a %s


Esta entrada fue publicada en 2013/05/03 por en Arpa Celta, Artículos, English Version, Luthería y etiquetada con , , .
A %d blogueros les gusta esto: